Seeking Justice
Is Justice a Right β or a Weapon of the Powerful?
We are Craig and Marie Stevenson from Fergus Falls, Minnesota. This website was born from our firsthand experience with a judicial system that betrayed us and the very principles it claims to defend. In Otter Tail County, we did not encounter a process grounded in truth, fairness, or impartiality. Nor did we find a system that respected or protected our constitutional rights. Instead, we faced a legal process distorted by favoritism, tainted by undisclosed relationships, and corrupted by a persistent disregard for the rules and selective enforcement of the law.
The evidence from our case suggests that the judicial system in Otter Tail County is beyond repair. The image to the right presents a visual summary of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) analysis of the key court orders in our case. For each ruling, AI evaluated the level of judicial bias based on the orderβs content and the corresponding hearing transcript. The results speak volumes about a system that is supposed to be fair.
A full-size version of the table shown in the image can be viewed [here]. AI analysis summaries for each order are available using the blue links in the table on the page.
This platform exists to hold the Otter Tail County and Minnesota judicial systems accountable. What happened to us should notβand must notβhappen to anyone else.
U.S Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once wrote, βSunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.β Itβs time to shine that light where itβs long been needed.

“The quest for truth
should alarm no one.”
Craig S. Stevenson
Accuracy:
We strive to be honest snd accurate in our statements and we continually update this site with new information and more citations to the record.
We also try to be minimalist in our conclusions. Although we certainly have our own opinions, we have chosen to feed the original data, from actual court documents, into Artificial Intelligence (AI) and let it provide a fair and balanced analysis.
Artificial Intelligence:
This website uses Artificial Intelligence (AI) extensively to deliver fair, neutral, and objective analysis.
AI reviews of judicial orders and decisions aim to align with prevailing law and assess whether all parties were treated fairly and impartially, consistent with the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct.
AI-generated content or background information is clearly marked with a green border.
Our current AI analyses are powered by ChatGPT from OpenAI.
Citations:
Citations to public court documents are denoted by the document number and the location.Β For example:Β (Doc. 429, at 22-25.)
Unless otherwise noted, these document numbers correspond to the index number on the Minnesota Court Records Online (MCRO) website for case number 56-CV-20-2928. Most of these documents are freely available to the general public.
Citations to confidential court documents are denoted by using red text.Β For example: (Doc. 316.) These documents are not available to the general public.
Case law citations are denoted by italicized text. For example: Complaint Concerning Winton, 350 N.W.2d 337, 340 (Minn. 1984)
Hyperlinks:
Blue text is used to denote a hyperlink, which takes you to another website or to a different page or location on this website when clicked.
The text [AI Analysis] is used to denote a link to a page on this website that contains a detailed Artificial Intelligence (AI) Analysis of our own experience surrounding a particular issue.
Quotations:
Quotations by legal authorities and famous persons are denoted by a text box with a gold background.
Quotations from public court documents, Minnesota Statutes, Secondary Legal Authorities, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) queries are denoted by a blue vertical bar. For example:
Honesty is a minimum qualification expected of every judge.
In re Conduct of Karasov, 805 N.W.2d 255, 276 (Minn. 2011)
“The truth is in the gaps.”
Craig S. Stevenson

“Justice requires that the judicial process be fair and that it appear to be fair; it necessarily follows that a presiding judge must be impartial and must appear to be impartial.”
State v. Pratt, 813 N.W.2d 868, 878 (Minn. 2012)
Topics For Detailed Examination:
Attorney Conduct
Discovery & Evidence Handling
Judge Kevin M. Miller
Judicial Conduct
Judicial Staff
Privacy and Confidentiality
Systemic Issues
Four things belong to a judge: to hear courteously, to answer wisely, to consider soberly, and to decide impartially.
(β[I]mpartiality is the very foundation of the American judicial system.β). βTo maintain public trust and confidence in the judiciary, judges should avoid the appearance of impropriety and should act to assure that parties have no reason to think their case is not being fairly judged.β State v. Henry, No. A06-671, 2007 WL 1470179, at *4 (Minn. Ct. App. May 22, 2007)