- Issuing body
- Minnesota District Court
- Case number
- 56-CV-20-2928
- Signed and filed
- September 24, 2024
- Document type
- Supplemental declaration of Craig Stevenson
- Result or filing position
- Plaintiff supplies additional assertions and record citations
- Primary issue
- Law-clerk assignments and relationships raised in recusal dispute
- Length
- 5 pages
About this document
Craig Stevenson signed and filed this supplemental declaration on September 24, 2024, after attending the September 16 hearing on plaintiffs' motion to disqualify and vacate orders. It describes his recollection of Judge Miller's statements about law clerk James Morrison's employment and assistance to different judges.
The declaration cites records from other cases that Craig says show continued work involving Judge Mark Hansen after retirement and assistance to judges outside Morrison's primary assignment. It questions whether the relationships and extent of that assistance had been fully disclosed. The document contains the declarant's assertions, record references and inferences; it does not itself establish a judicial finding of bias or misconduct.
Why this document matters
This filing identifies the additional records and reasoning plaintiffs offered after the hearing. Comparing it with the hearing transcript helps distinguish the judge's recorded words from the declaration's expressly paraphrased recollections and subsequent inferences.
Source note: Summary based on PDF pages 1-5. Consult the original document for exact wording, citations, signatures and formatting.
Related Justice-Denied reporting
Read the extracted text transcript
Accessible document transcript
[Page 1] STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Craig Stevenson and Marie Stevenson, Plaintiffs, Court File No.: 56-CV-20-2928 Case Type: Other Civil v. Sean Christopher Stevenson, Renee Stevenson, Lisa Stevenson-Allen, and Ashley Anderson, Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF CRAIG STEVENSON STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF OTTER TAIL ) Craig Stevenson declares as follows: 1. I am one of the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter. 2. I have been married to Plaintiff Marie Stevenson (“Marie”) for over 34 years. September 16, 2024 Hearing 3. Marie and I attended, via Zoom, the September 16, 2024 hearing regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion to Disqualify and Vacate Orders. 4. During the hearing, Judge Miller made statements regarding the Law Clerk James Morrison’s employment with the Otter Tail County District Court. 5. Judge Miller stated James Morrison began working as Judge Mark Hansen’s law clerk in November 2013. 6. Judge Miller then stated James Morrison began working as Judge Sharon Benson’s law 56-CV-20-2928 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/24/2024 10:24 PM [Page 2] 2 clerk in September 2016. 7. Judge Miller also stated James Morrison began working for Judge Miller in late summer 2022 and Clerk Morrison had no other involvement with Plaintiffs’ case for the preceding six years.1 8. Judge Miller appeared to say that these six years were calculated from the date when Judge Hansen retired and when James Morrison became Judge Miller’s law clerk and began working on the orders in Plaintiffs’ case. 9. Judge Miller’s suggestion that there was a clean break in the connection between Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen did not seem logical to me, given the 3 -year clerking relationship between them. 10. It seemed much more logical to me that the relationship between Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen would have continued even after Judge Hansen’s retirement, especially given his status as a Senior Judge, the amount of time Judge Hansen spent at the Otter Tail County Courthouse, and the number of hearings he held at that location following his retirement, up to and including six hearings on December 6, 2019. (Doc. 527, ¶¶ 196-218.) 11. I also thought this scenario was much more likely when considered along with Judge Hansen’s insistence that Defense Attorney Kirsten Hansen disclose her familial relationship with Judge Hansen to Judge Miller during the very first hearing in our case, since Judge Hansen would have been aware of various employment and personal relationships along with any potential conflicts of interest which might require disclosure. 12. As a result, I reviewed public records for Judge Hansen’s post-retirement cases using 1 Judge Miller’s exact wording was different than mine, but I have paraphrased his statement , and what I think he meant, to the best of my recollection. 56-CV-20-2928 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/24/2024 10:24 PM [Page 3] 3 Minnesota Court Records Online (“MCRO”). 13. On September 18, 2024, two days after the hearing, I found records reflecting that the working relationship between Judge Mark Hansen and Law Clerk James Morrison continued beyond Judge Hansen’s retirement. ( See Pelican Rapids Leased Housing Associates I, LLC vs Broadway/Pelican Rapids, L.P., Pelican Rapids Townhomes, LP, 56-CV-16-372.) 14. In a letter to counsel for both sides dated January 20, 2017 – more than four months after Judge Hansen’s retirement, Clerk Morrison identified himself in the letterhead as “Law Clerk to the Honorable Mark F. Hansen.” (Doc. 273.) 15. On January 27, 2017, Clerk Morrison was communicating with counsel via email regarding his earlier letter. (Doc. 274.) 16. That same day, Judge Hansen signed an order based on Clerk Morrison's communications with counsel. (Doc. 275.) 17. These documents clearly show Judge Hansen continued to rely on Clerk Morrison to write letters, communicate with counsel on behalf of the Court Administrator for the Otter Tail County District Court, and coordinate with Judge Hansen regarding the issuance of orders even after Judge Hansen’s retirement. 18. These records, although present in MCRO since January 2017, and undoubtedly known to Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen, were not disclosed to Plaintiffs to illustrate the continuing connection between Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen. 19. These records seem to contradict Defendants’ references to the relationship between Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen as “long-terminated” (Doc. 520, at 14 .) The records also call into question whether the “former employment relationship” between Clerk Morrison and Judge Hansen had been “terminated six years prior”. (Doc. 520, at 17.) 56-CV-20-2928 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/24/2024 10:24 PM [Page 4] 4 20. This information also appears to contradict the suggestion that Clerk Morrison had no involvement with Judge Hansen or with Plaintiffs’ case for the years between the retirement of Judge Hansen and subsequent employment of Clerk Morrison by Judge Benson in September 2016 and Judge Miller’s utilization of Clerk Morrison in this case beginning in September 2022. Exclusivity 21. During the September 16, 2024 hearing, Judge Miller also seemed to say that Clerk Morrison worked exclusively for Judge Hansen from November 2013 through September 201 6, for Judge Benson from September 201 6 through September 2022, and for Judge Miller from September 2022 through the present. 22. However, using the employment timelines provided by the Court, information from MCRO is at odds with this conclusion. For example: a. According to MCRO, Clerk Morrison assisted Judge Mark Hansen in January 2017 while serving as Judge Sharon Benson’s law clerk. ( See Pelican Rapids Leased Housing Associates I, LLC vs Broadway/Pelican Rapids, L.P., Pelican Rapids Townhomes, LP , 56-CV-16-372, Docs. 273, 274, 275.) b. According to MCRO, Clerk Morrison assisted Judge Waldemar Senyk in November 2017 and April 2018 while serving as Judge Sharon Benson’s law clerk. (See Thumper Pond Resort, LLC d/b/a Thumper Pond Resort vs Stock Building Supply Midwest, LLC, Kaashagen & Sons, Inc. n/k/a BJK Construction, Inc., Badger Midwest Holdings, LLC, Gorski and Associates, LLC, MiTek USA, Inc., 56-CV-16-3000, Docs.156 and 256.) c. According to MCRO, Clerk Morrison assisted Judge Kevin Miller in 56-CV-20-2928 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/24/2024 10:24 PM [Page 5] 56-CV-20-2928 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 9/24/2024 10:24 PM SeptemberandOctober2018whileservingasJudgeSharonBenson'slawclerk.7d.Docs.318,330,and331.)d.AccordingtoMCRO,ClerkMorrisonassistedJudgeJonathanJuddinOctober2023whileservingasJudgeKevinMiller'slawclerk.(SeeTerryL.Butcher,PatriciaF.ButchervsKellyI.Drey,PaulO.Winger,MargaretW.Drey,MichaelDrey,asTrusteeoftheInsuranceTrustAgreementofKellyI.DreydatedMay18,1970,RobertT.Noyeset.al.,56-CV-21-521,Doc.65.)23.ThereareadditionalexamplesavailableonMCRO,butitappearsasifMr.MorrisonassistsotherOtterTailCountyDistrictCourtjudgesinmanycapacitiesregardlessofhisspecificjudicialofficerassignment.24.GiventhewidevarietyofactivitiesdocumentedinMCRO,itappearstobeverylikelythatMr.Morrisonalsoassistedhisfellowlawclerkswithavarietyoftasks,includinginthiscase.25.However,additionalinformationabouttheextentofClerkMorrison'srelationshipwithJudgeHansenfollowinghisretirementandClerkMorrison'sassistancewithJudgeMiller'sotherordersinPlaintiffs'caseremainsundisclosedandunavailabletoPlaintiffs.IdeclareunderpenaltyofperjurythateverythingIhavestatedinthi trueandcorrect. Dated:September24,2024 CraigS.Stevenson 5
