Justice-Denied · Editorial cartoons
Cartoon 14 of 26
Small-Town Seating
Satire. Dialogue is imagined; the underlying rulings and records are linked below.
Read cartoon text
Panel 1: OTTER TAIL · 2013–2014
Three generic judicial robes hang on hooks beside empty courtroom chairs. Three signed cards read RECUSAL. No actual judges pictured or named on robes.
Signed notice: The appearance matters. I will step aside.
Panel 2: THREE RECUSALS
Three chairs stand empty, with signed recusal notices on the seats.
Reader: Three judges. Three appearance concerns.
Panel 3: THE 2025 APPEAL
A 2025 appellate opinion sits beside an occupied chair. Depict a different court, not the same judge reversing course.
Opinion: Familiarity is normal in a small community.
Panel 4: DIFFERENT SEATING POLICY
A reader holds both records between the empty chairs and occupied chair. The existing plaintiff-side human figure in this panel is Craig Stevenson.
Craig: Does the furniture decide which connections matter?
Artwork caption: Imagined dialogue. Signed 2013–2014 recusal notices; Stevenson, A25-0186 (2025), p. 8.
Behind the cartoon
In Western Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Ugstad Plumbing, a property-damage case involving Robert and Lois Russell, three Otter Tail County judges recused—stepped aside—in 2013–2014. Their notices cited knowing the Russells, discussing damage to their home, or a daughter’s partnership in a law firm involved.
In 2025, Craig and Marie Stevenson sought to disqualify Judge Kevin M. Miller because a clerk assisting him had previously worked for the father of a defense lawyer. The Court of Appeals affirmed denial, emphasizing the realities of a small community with three judges. The cartoon compares the expressed approaches to familiarity.
Underlying records
- Judge Waldemar Senyk recusal, January31,2013, 56-CV-13-228Single-page signed notice, item3 handwritten explanation: acquainted with the Russells, discussed fire damage; 'I would appear biased.'
- Judge Mark Hansen recusal, signedFebruary10/filedFebruary11,2014,56-CV-13-228Single-page signed notice, item3: 'My daughter is a partner in one of the firms involved in the litigation.'
- Judge Barbara Hanson recusal,February14,2014,56-CV-13-228Single-page signed notice,item3: knows Russells, Mr.Russell regularly appears as attorney; recusal 'to avoid an appearance of impropriety.'
- Stevenson v. Stevenson, A25-0186, July28,2025 (nonprecedential)p4 clerk-assignment statement and appearance standard; pp5-6 review/appearance analysis; p6 footnote3 and plaintiffs' January2017 assertion; p8 substantive-influence finding and small-three-judge-community reasoning; p9 affirmance.
More record detail
Judge Waldemar Senyk recusal, January31,2013, 56-CV-13-228: Single-page signed notice, item3 handwritten explanation: acquainted with the Russells, discussed fire damage; 'I would appear biased.'; Judge Mark Hansen recusal, signedFebruary10/filedFebruary11,2014,56-CV-13-228: Single-page signed notice, item3: 'My daughter is a partner in one of the firms involved in the litigation.'; Judge Barbara Hanson recusal,February14,2014,56-CV-13-228: Single-page signed notice,item3: knows Russells, Mr.Russell regularly appears as attorney; recusal 'to avoid an appearance of impropriety.'; Stevenson v. Stevenson, A25-0186, July28,2025 (nonprecedential): p4 clerk-assignment statement and appearance standard; pp5-6 review/appearance analysis; p6 footnote3 and plaintiffs' January2017 assertion; p8 substantive-influence finding and small-three-judge-community reasoning; p9 affirmance.

