Antiquated Cases
This post examines an Otter Tail District Court judge’s use of antiquated case law in his opinions and why it conflicted with newer, better-fitting Minnesota authority.
Browse investigations, commentary, and records-based analysis from Craig Stevenson.
This post examines an Otter Tail District Court judge’s use of antiquated case law in his opinions and why it conflicted with newer, better-fitting Minnesota authority.
Sean Stevenson’s deleted Patrick Burns review
Otter Tail County District Court Judge Kevin Miller suggested that whether a statement accuses someone of a crime “naturally turns” on the actual elements of that crime. Minnesota law says otherwise.
When a court brackets out the very fact summary judgment requires it to consider.
How disputed facts became the basis for denying an amendment the rules say should be freely allowed.
How a narrow anti-waiver doctrine became a broad shield against civil discovery.
What a privilege log is supposed to prevent
When a chief judge won’t engage the record
A watchdog that won’t look is not a watchdog.
Why Minnesota’s ban on independent judicial fact-gathering cannot survive a “unique circumstances” exception.
How selective quotations and omitted authority turned marital privacy into a supposedly waivable boundary.
What a new appellate decision gets right—and what it accidentally exposes about how trust in the judicial system erodes.