A Protective Order Under Attack
The Post-Judgment Battle Over Medical Records, Genetic Data, and Private Evidence
The Post-Judgment Battle Over Medical Records, Genetic Data, and Private Evidence
What Minnesota’s newest AI-citation warnings reveal about a much older problem: legal authority must be real, quotations must be accurate, and courts must not let unsupported narratives become law.
The district court has decided the protective order dispute. We can now begin explaining what happened—and what remains unresolved.
Judge Kevin Miller allowed medical professionals to declare that child sexual abuse was “confirmed.” The Minnesota Court of Appeals held that he violated controlling law.
Justice-Denied condemns threats and violence without reservation. But protecting judges must not mean protecting the judicial system from peaceful criticism, public scrutiny, or demands for accountability.
How a statement about deleted text messages shaped a critical discovery hearing
How an attorney's false claim undermined sworn testimony
When a technically true statement misled the court
How an admitted false statement became a public attorney-discipline case—and how accountability affected the result.
Record complaints, serious candor violations, and numbers that need clarification
What Minnesota cases reveal about independent judicial investigations
How three proposed class actions raised questions about privacy protections, cybersecurity discovery, protective orders, and claims of privilege